The chairman, Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT), Danladi Umar, has said that he is not answerable to any institution aside the presidency.

In a report by Punch, Umar said this while responding to a petition against him by the Incorporated Trustees of the Centre for Justice and Peace Initiative, a non-governmental organisation.

According to Umar, he and members of the tribunal are not judicial officers, hence they cannot be subjected to disciplinary actions by the National Judicial Council (NJC) or the Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC).

The group through a petition signed by Grace Wogor had asked the FJSC to take legal actions against the CCT chairman over an abuse of court processes for granting the order to suspend Justice Walter Onnoghen, chief justice of Nigeria (CJN) without due process.

But in a letter dated February 6, 2019 to the acting chairman of the FJSC, Umar responded that he didn’t breach the judicial oath as members of the CCT only take official oaths and not judicial oaths during inaugurations.

Umar said, he granted the ex parte order because it was within his power and added that he would not comment further on the matter, to avoid subjudice, since it was already before the appellate court.

“With regard to the prayer of the petitioner for an appropriate sanction against the chairman, it is important to note that the chairman and members of the tribunal, not being judicial officers, are not constitutionally subject to any disciplinary proceedings by either the National Judicial Council or the Federal Judicial Service Commission but the Presidency. .

“The petitioner alleged that judicial oaths were breached and that the National Judicial Council should consider appropriate sanctions. It is to be noted that the chairman and members of the Code of Conduct Tribunal are not judicial officers.

“This is predicated on the fact that the chairman and members of the tribunal, during swearing-in, only subscribe to official oaths and not judicial oaths. Therefore, not being a judicial officer, I did not subscribe to judicial oaths as alleged”.

The CCT chairman reportedly attached a letter dated May 18, 2015 signed by Justice Mahmud Mohammed, former CJN and chairman of the NJC, which stated that members of the CCT should not be referred to as justices because they are not judges.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: